Bug_Collection_by_Undistilled

When Bible study becomes your personal bug collection

At this Wednesday night’s Ecclesia National Gathering plenary session, Mandy Smith used a great metaphor that captures what irks me about the attitude toward Bible study I have seen at times in conservative evangelicalism. She was preaching from Hebrews 4:12-13, which says, “Indeed, the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing until it divides soul from spirit, joints from marrow; it is able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. And before him no creature is hidden, but all are naked and laid bare to the eyes of the one to whom we must render an account.” The Bible is supposed to be a sword that pierces our heart and does spiritual “surgery” on us so that we can be sanctified in our personal lives of discipleship. But we don’t let it do this to us when we have turned the truths of the Bible into our personal ideological display-case like a collection of dead, preserved bugs, each conquered and stabbed with a needle for a middle-school science project.

As long as we are categorizing Biblical truths like bugs into our all-encompassing system of explaining everything, then the Bible is only provisionally authoritative for the sake of our own authority. Instead of the Holy Spirit, we are the ones holding the sharp, two-edged sword in order to pierce other peoples’ souls and spirits and to keep it away from our own. A truth that is perfectly clear and systematized is not a “living and active” word. Things become perfectly clear and stationary when they’re dead; when we’ve conquered them.

Former poet laureate Billy Collins’ Introduction to Poetry expresses the attitude with which many evangelical Christians approach Biblical interpretation:

I ask them to take a poem
and hold it up to the light
like a color slide

or press an ear against its hive.

I say drop a mouse into a poem
and watch him probe his way out,

or walk inside the poem’s room
and feel the walls for a light switch.

I want them to waterski
across the surface of a poem
waving at the author’s name on the shore.

But all they want to do
is tie the poem to a chair with rope
and torture a confession out of it.

They begin beating it with a hose
to find out what it really means.

Calling the Bible a poem, or even worse a mystery, is offensive to many evangelicals because what they hear is an attempt to wriggle your way out of obedience to God. But there’s an underside to this concern as well. Poetry is a much more frightening master than prose, because poetry cannot be mastered. Submitting to poetry is an art rather than a science, which makes it a lot harder to guarantee an A+ for yourself. It’s like the difference between grading an English term paper and a calculus exam. I knew in college that if I learned all the formulas in calculus and executed them correctly on my final exam, I would get a 100. Even though I ended up leaving the engineering school to be an English major, there was nothing more irritating than the English professor who gave me a B+ because my paper was technically correct, but fell short of being “inspired.”

If God speaks only in prose, i.e. grammatical-historical “fact,” then you can be a conquistador of God’s word. There’s a clearly quantifiable measure of the knowledge that you gain which is directly proportional to your power and prestige in the Christian community as a Bible teacher. Learning the Bible gives you authority, which is why you are invested in the Bible’s authority. You become an expert theological swordsman. But if God speaks in poetry, then some illiterate indigenous woman from Guatemala can “get” a Bible passage better than you do even if she hasn’t been a Christian for nearly as long as you have and she’s never heard of Karl Barth. The sovereignty of prose is transferable to the interpreter; poetry retains its sovereignty over the interpreter precisely insofar as it remains mysterious and refuses to submit to grammar or history.

I think the greatest crisis in evangelical Biblical interpretation today is not that evangelicals have stopped respecting the Bible’s authority; it’s that evangelicals have turned the Bible into a set of “truths” to be stabbed with a needle and put into a display case like dead bees and dragonflies and beetles. Ideology has replaced discipleship in an era when “holiness” is measured by your willingness to be politically incorrect and stand with the brave souls who refuse to bake cakes for people whose marriages they don’t approve. Christians today “stand up for the Bible” by spending hours arguing vociferously in facebook comment threads instead of seeing the Bible as the means by which God sculpts them to cultivate the spiritual fruits Paul described in Galatians 5:22-23.

What if we allowed ourselves to be the ones who get stabbed, judged, and healed by God’s living and active word instead of turning the Bible into dead, static truths that we stab and display like a bunch of dead bugs?

  • Joe

    If I remember right, you don’t read the comments on RLC any more (and I can’t say I blame you), but not too long ago I had a discussion with another RLC commenter on the nature of discussions themselves. He likened commenting to a fencing bout. As a fencer, I appreciate that, but as a minister of the Gospel, I find it a very troubling analogy. No matter what your style, the basic point of fencing is to stab without being stabbed. So in essence, he was saying he views discussions in that same manner: the goal is to force the other person to concede a point without being forced to concede a point yourself. I just can’t agree with such a combative view of discussions in general, let alone discussions centered on God and our Christian lives. As you say, God needs to be the one wielding the blade, and we need to be more willing to let God turn it on us. We need to be open to the movement of the Spirit, rather than spending so much energy attempting to parry every move God makes.

    • MorganGuyton

      Yeah wow when you lay out there like that, it really does seem repugnant.

    • JoFlemings

      It does seem like truth should stand alone and we should be able to examine ourselves in its light and then discuss what we understand. The challenge is that we are all usually blind and therefore depend on someone else’s perspective of us to help us to conform to what is true- that is where we all have to put down the blades and get out the bandages.

  • JoFlemings

    Hey- you could have written this BEFORE I wrote my theology midterm for my Catholic class, where all my proof texts for my points were Bible verses that I whipped out of my convert bat belt- and I so thought I was getting away with something- (these people don’t read the Bible, they read the bulletin.) In fact, I have more than once had to confess a need to purify my intentions because of the temptation to write a book translating the wisdom of the ages from one context into the other (Catholic to Protestant- Protestant to Catholic) in order to make a million dollars- ala Prayer of Jabez.
    (Disclaimer- my professor is an exceptional Catholic Christian theologian, profoundly spiritual man who does very much know his Sacred Scripture, and so do many of my Catholic brothers and sisters, so I am just being a wiseacre here- in need of a buck up. I am the least Christian person I know today, who is attempting to adhere to the gospel. Thank God the east is a l-o-n-g way from the west, prooftext: Psalm 103:12)

    • MorganGuyton

      Where are you studying?

      • JoFlemings

        Avila Institute.For the record my professor and classmates are exceptionally devout, intelligent and spiritually minded people, if there are any posers or slackers- they would be me.

  • Muff Potter

    Morgan,
    This is one of your best posts yet. It won’t deter the full-on Fundamentalist Jihadi Christian culture warrior, but it just might give others pause before they follow the Jihadists.

  • pastordt

    Outstanding work here, Morgan. Just stellar. Thank you very much. I will undoubtedly quote you and refer folks here as I close off my Q & A series with one last question: What do I do with all the weird/hard stuff in the Bible? This is just perfect.

    • MorganGuyton

      Thanks Diana. Glad it was helpful.

  • MollyDeed

    Shared and quoted with a colleague! Loved the analogy.

  • Rod

    Very good post. I would just add that when we read word of God in the Bible and assume that it means Bible we are making an assumption. The readers of Hebrews clearly would not have been thinking of a book when they read this verse but rather the revelation of God thru the Spirit. The Bible really didn’t exist as we know it at this time and the Old testament copies were not overly plentiful because Gutenberg wasn’t born yet. God can certainly speak to us thru the Bible but it is the Spirit guided revelation that is sharper than any two edged sword and not mental studying of the scriptures. See John 5:39

    • MorganGuyton

      Thank you. Excellent point.